[Carpet] expensive logging of CarpetRegrid[2] parameter changes
Ian Hinder
hinder at gravity.psu.edu
Wed Nov 7 20:53:30 CET 2007
Erik Schnetter wrote:
> The problem appears if you set these parameters explicitly in the
> parameter file which you use for recovering. Many people use the same
> parameter file for the initial submission and for recovering, and in
> this case, you overwrite the stored parameters and change the grid
> structure.
I see - yes in that case it is confusing. However, in our case, we only
set the coordinates parameter in the code, not in the parameter file, so
this does not affect us.
> I am speaking of CarpetRegrid2 here. I am not suggesting to change
> CarpetRegrid. CarpetRegrid2 does not even check the parameters during
> evolution, which is what I meant with "outdated": you can steer
> CarpetRegrid2's parameters, but this won't have any effect.
Oh I see. That's ok then :) By the way, I think there is an
inconsistency between CarpetTracker and CarpetRegrid2. Probably some
patches didn't get pushed regarding these parameters and grid scalars.
I think we discussed this ages ago but I never followed it up.
--
Ian Hinder
hinder at gravity.psu.edu
http://www.gravity.psu.edu/~hinder
More information about the developers
mailing list