[Carpet] checkpoint at run-time request

[Steve White]

Bela,

I just want to hear what the others think.

Regarding ManualTermination, I don't know for sure, but I suspect that
it would be easy to modify.

However, I would like to give it a different name...because in this case
we wouldn't be terminating anything...

On 20.10.06, Bela Szilagyi wrote:
> Yes, this was my initial thougt.  Steve suggested that this should be more 
> generic.
> 
> 
> On Friday 20 October 2006 15:41, Luca Baiotti wrote:
> > Hi Bela,
> >
> > > Could one just send a signal of some sort to the running code and have
> > > the checkpoint file be dumped?
> >
> > this would be similar (tough not equal) to what
> > AEIThorns/ManualTermination does.
> >
> > Luca.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > developers mailing list
> > developers at lists.carpetcode.org
> > http://lists.carpetcode.org/listinfo/developers
> 
> -- 
> Bela Szilagyi
> 
> Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik
> Albert-Einstein-Institut
> Tel: +49 331 567 7632
> Fax: +49 331 567 7649
> 
> _______________________________________________
> developers mailing list
> developers at lists.carpetcode.org
> http://lists.carpetcode.org/listinfo/developers
> 

-- 
Steve White : Programmer
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik      Albert-Einstein-Institut
Am Mühlenberg 1, D-14476 Golm, Germany                  +49-331-567-7625