[Carpet] Carpet scheduling question

[Thomas Radke]

Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> Hi, Frank,
> 
> you asked [[about my "how to have A come before B when A is in local mode
> and B is in global mode" query]]
> 
>>What prevents the scheduler / us to do that for all local routines, such 
>>that the order is always as specified?

Maybe Frank's question could also be asked as: Why don't we make 
global-loop-local the default mode (rather than local) ?

> Thomas Radke and I have been working for several months on trying to
> expand the Carpet documentation to better explain how Carpet scheduling
> works.  We've made a lot of progress, and hope to something ready to
> push to darcs later this week.  I plan to include the problem I posed
> in my query to Erik as an example in this documentation, along with
> a discussion of the various possible solutions.

Jonathan, let's try to get this thing out very soon. I'm afraid that 
otherwise we'll run into a long email-only discussion thread again, and 
people (like me) later have to tediously gather all the relevant 
information from the email archive.

-- 
Cheers, Thomas.